Category
Sub-category
Description
Outcome of interest
Scientific |
Astronomers, Biologists |
Bench scientists, experts and novices, original creators, reusers, publishers, comparators and evaluators/reviewers, scientific communities |
Mentions in methods section of publications, posters, talks, etc.; components in domain research oriented applications. Demonstrators, citation mechanisms, reputation systems, management of in silico research artefacts , semantic model for research artefacts |
|
Astro- and Bio- informaticians |
Specialists in the domain focusing on the informatics. Hybrids. Scientific communities. e.g. BOSC (Bioinformatics Open Source Conference) workshop, the Dutch national Bioinformatics support program BioAssist |
Software, services and algorithms |
|
Scientific programmers and developers |
Developers of innovative techniques, tools and services for digital preservation within domains; e.g. Developers day, community events |
Software, services and algorithms |
|
Other Sciences and Researchers |
Project scope includes user communities beyond immediate project partners |
Translation of tools, techniques and thinking into new areas |
Technology Researchers |
Semantic Web & Linked Data |
Case studies in use of Linked Data within the architectural style of the project; e.g. Presentations at technical meetings and workshops, e.g. at Intl Conf of Web Semantics |
Demonstrators |
|
Services |
Services, Web Services and software architecture community; e.g. service architectures to handle data management with Linked Data |
Service design principles |
|
Provenance & e-Science |
Provenance research and practitioner communities; e.g. W3C Provenance Working Group; DCMI Metadata Provenance Task force |
Standardization |
|
Scientific workflows |
Research community and multiple practitioner communities, designers of workflow management systems |
Preservation strategies |
|
Scholarly Communication and Digital Libraries |
Library and Information Science communities; e.g. Presentations at technical meetings and workshops, e.g. at JCDL, TPDL (formerly ECDL), OAI, OR etc. |
Data/method publication lifecycle |
e-Infrastructure software & service developers |
Digital Libraries and Data centres |
e.g. European Bioinformatics Institute, International Virtual Observatory Alliance (IVOA) |
Increase DL user base in the scientific domain, especially in workflow-intensive communities |
|
EU infrastructure and projects |
EGI, relevant ESFRI projects such as Elixir and SKA, and specialist projects such as BioVeL. |
Increase user base, influence future infrastructure |
|
Digital library and preservation projects |
SCAPE, dataNET, others funded in same programme, Open Phacts (IMI) |
New practice emerging from Wf4Ever |
|
Open source community |
BOSC Open Bioinformatics Foundation |
Community development encompassing Wf4Ever |
Scholarly Comms content & service providers |
Digital Libraries & Institutional and Discipline Repositories |
Arkive, British Library, Datacite.org |
New practice emerging from Wf4Ever |
|
Commercial publishers |
Elsevier, Nature Publishing, IOS Press |
Rich publications |
Standards and community bodies |
Digital Curation and Preservation organisations |
Open Archives Initiative, UKOLN, Digital Curation Centre, The Coalition for Networked Information, CODATA, KNOS, CrossRef: Datacite, ORCID, OAIS-ORE |
Use Cases |
|
Astronomy interop standards |
IVOA InterOp and Exec |
Increasing automation through Wf4Ever preservation practice influencing standards e.g. through use cases |
|
Technical |
Provenance, workflows. Previous relevant groups include Health Care Life Sciences and Library Linked Data; e.g. W3C Provenance WG |
Influencing standards, e.g. through use cases |
|
Open Science movements and projects |
Multiple open science initiatives and activities; e.g. Open Knowledge Foundation, Open Society Institute, OpenScienceSummit |
Adoption of workflows as part of open science practices, esp. for reproducibility |
Funding Councils and Policy makers |
National, European, International |
e.g. BIS, RCUK, JISC; CICYT, CDTI |
Research agendas and strategy |
|
Scholarly societies |
The scholarly societies that will impact cultural take-up of the outcomes; e.g. ISCB |
Credit and reputation |
Public Citizens |
Astronomy |
Galaxy Zoo |
Increased citizen awareness of science science but also participation |
Industry |
Editorial market |
Wf4Ever aims to stimulate a paradigm shift in the publication methods of scientific results, especially in experimental sciences, where workflows are a cornerstone. e.g. Nature, Elsevier, and PLoS |
Demonstrators |
|
Pharmaceutical market |
Pharma R&D is collaboration, data and workflow intensive. Some consortium partners have a presence in this market, through links with e,g, the Pistoia Alliance, BioITWorld and the 8 commercial partners in the Open PHACTS IMI. |
Demonstrators |