Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

This follows on the plea I made to think about services on top of Semantic Web / Linked Data resources. Carole called them 'top-middleware' services I think.

Would this make sense?

dLibra -> exposes content via Generic Semantic Web interface (Sesame API?, - we have Web Service available for that.)
  -> RO-services expose RO specific interface for (web) applications (SOAP service, Ruby gem, etcetera?)
  -> Various web applications can perform RO-specific I/O through an application-specific user interface (typically not made by us)

* The RO model is independently exposed (hence, RO semantics available for any tool to use)
* Combination of exposed RO-model (RDF) and generic RDF interface would do the trick already; RO-services make it convenient and allow us to control access.
* RO-box would be one of the applications; Taverna, myExperiment, etcetera could be others, use for annotation?
* The RO-services hide (SPARQL) details and are RO-specific.

  • No labels